“Can you be flexible?”
For disabled people, this phrase is rarely a genuine request. More often, it’s an expectation — one that appears in workplaces, healthcare systems, relationships, schools, and public spaces. It’s framed as reasonable, neutral, even kind. But over time, it becomes something else entirely: a demand that disabled people absorb inconvenience, discomfort, and harm so systems don’t have to change.
In 2025, flexibility is still praised as a virtue. But when flexibility only ever flows in one direction, it stops being adaptability — and starts becoming exploitation.
This article examines why disabled people are constantly expected to be flexible, how that expectation causes harm, who actually benefits from it, and what real inclusion would look like instead.
What “Be Flexible” Really Means for Disabled People
On the surface, flexibility sounds harmless. In practice, it often translates to:
- Working through pain, fatigue, or flare-ups
- Accepting inaccessible environments
- Delaying or avoiding accommodations
- Adjusting needs to fit existing systems
- Lowering expectations for care, access, or dignity
Disabled people are rarely asked what flexibility costs them. Instead, flexibility is treated as a personal responsibility — something disabled individuals must provide so workplaces, institutions, and relationships don’t have to adapt.
The unspoken message is clear: your needs are the problem.
Flexibility as a One-Way Street
If flexibility were truly mutual, systems would bend too. But most of the time, they don’t.
Consider how often disabled people are expected to:
- Wait longer for healthcare
- Work around inaccessible technology
- Accept unpredictable schedules
- Navigate buildings not designed for them
- Educate others about their disability
Meanwhile, organizations resist:
- Adjusting productivity metrics
- Updating accessibility policies
- Funding accommodations proactively
- Trusting disabled people’s lived experience
Flexibility becomes a demand placed on disabled bodies, not a value embedded in systems.
The Workplace: Where “Flexibility” Becomes Burnout
In workplaces, disabled employees are often praised for being “low maintenance,” “easygoing,” or “resilient.” These compliments usually mean one thing: they aren’t asking for what they need.
Disabled workers are frequently expected to:
- Work through symptoms to appear reliable
- Avoid requesting accommodations repeatedly
- Make up lost time after medical appointments
- Meet productivity standards designed for non-disabled bodies
When burnout follows, it’s framed as a personal failure — not a systemic one.
True flexibility at work would mean designing roles with variability in mind, not treating disability as an exception that needs constant justification.
Healthcare: When Patients Are Told to Adjust to Broken Systems
Healthcare settings frequently demand flexibility from disabled patients while offering very little in return.
Patients are expected to:
- Wait months or years for diagnosis
- Accept dismissal or minimization of symptoms
- Navigate inaccessible clinics
- Repeat their medical history endlessly
- Manage care coordination themselves
When disabled people struggle under these conditions, they’re labeled “difficult,” “non-compliant,” or “anxious.” Rarely is the system itself questioned.
Flexibility, in healthcare, often means tolerating harm quietly.
Relationships and Social Life: The Cost of Constant Adjustment
Disabled people are also expected to be flexible in friendships, families, and romantic relationships.
This can look like:
- Canceling plans without complaint
- Accepting inaccessible venues
- Downplaying pain to avoid “ruining the mood”
- Explaining limitations repeatedly
Over time, this creates emotional distance and isolation. Disabled people learn that their presence is conditional — welcomed only when it doesn’t require others to change.
Flexibility becomes a survival strategy, not a choice.
Who Actually Benefits From This Expectation?
The expectation that disabled people be flexible doesn’t exist by accident. It benefits specific groups:
- Employers who avoid accommodation costs
- Institutions that resist systemic reform
- Non-disabled people who remain comfortable
- Systems designed around efficiency, not equity
Flexibility preserves the status quo. It allows systems to claim inclusion without changing how they operate.
The cost of that convenience is paid by disabled people — with their health, stability, and dignity.
The Emotional Labor Behind “Being Flexible”
Flexibility requires emotional work that often goes unseen.
Disabled people constantly calculate:
- Is it worth asking for help?
- Will I be believed?
- Am I asking for too much?
- Will this make me seem difficult?
This internal negotiation is exhausting. It adds an invisible workload to everyday life — one that rarely gets acknowledged.
Flexibility isn’t free. It’s labor.
Why This Is an Ableism Issue — Not a Personal One
When disabled people are told to be flexible, it’s often framed as individual resilience. But resilience shouldn’t be required to access basic rights.
This expectation is rooted in ableism — the belief that disabled people must adapt to systems built without them, rather than systems adapting to include them.
A truly inclusive society would ask different questions:
- Why is this system so rigid?
- Who was it designed for?
- Who gets excluded when flexibility is demanded?
What Real Flexibility Would Actually Look Like
Real flexibility isn’t about asking disabled people to bend further. It’s about building systems that expect human variability.
- Flexible work hours and productivity models
- Proactive accommodations — not reactive ones
- Accessible design as a default
- Trusting disabled people’s lived experience
- Shared responsibility for inclusion
Conclusion: Flexibility Should Not Be a Requirement for Dignity
Disabled people are some of the most adaptable people in society — not by choice, but by necessity. The problem isn’t a lack of flexibility. It’s a lack of accountability from the systems that demand it.
In 2025, inclusion means recognizing that accessibility isn’t about asking disabled people to try harder. It’s about building a world that doesn’t require constant compromise just to participate.
Flexibility should be shared. Dignity should be guaranteed.
💙 Enjoyed this article? Support my writing & advocacy:
📩 Stay Updated
Get new posts delivered to your inbox.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What do you think?